Lost Password? No account yet? Register
  • Narrow screen resolution
  • Wide screen resolution
  • Auto width resolution
  • Increase font size
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size
Empire, Faith and Kinship : Exploring 150 years of the Anglo Sikh Relationship PDF Print E-mail
Written by Amandeep Madra   
Monday, 15 October 2007

 

 

 

From the authors of "Warrior Saints" and "Sicques, Tigers or Thieves" comes a major new on-line exhibition exploring 150 years of the Anglo-Sikh relationship. The exhibition is available now on www.efk.ukpha.org

"Empire, Faith and Kinship" is an exhibtion that speaks volumes of a fascinating relationship that has touched and shaped the lives of millions. Through illustrations and detailed captions, the key events and people concerned are presented in eight sections, from the rise of the Sikh kingdom of Lahore in 1801 to the settling of the Sikh Diaspora in Britain in the twentieth century. Sometimes as friends, other times as foes, the Sikhs and the British have had one of the most rich and intriguing of partnerships.

Long before the two World Wars, the Punjab had earned a reputation among army recruiters as being the best area for recruiting ‘jawans ‘ or young men to fill the ranks of the military. At the time, it was generally accepted that Punjabi ethnic groups possessed a superior military prowess in comparison with other Indians from less military-inclined backgrounds. This ‘martial races’ theory gave due recognition to the widely regarded military tradition of the Sikhs. Thus favoured by the imperial military service, large numbers of them served in the regiments that saw action in the European theatres of war during both World Wars. As a direct result, many Sikhs were exposed to overseas experience that would later facilitate their migration to Britain.

Among the first Sikhs to arrive on British shores after the Second World War were ex-soldiers and their families. Labour shortages, caused in part by the need for more labour to reconstruct the infrastructure and the development of post-war Britain, together with the emergence of the National Health Service and rapid industrial growth, led to an active recruitment of labour from overseas colonies. During this period a small minority of ex-soldiers and other Sikhs came to settle in the UK. These early settlers filled the manual jobs available in the foundries and factories, most notably the Woolf Rubber Company near Southall in West London.

In 1962 Britain’s Conservative government passed the first Act restricting the entry of Commonwealth citizens to Britain. Intending immigrants were henceforth required to obtain work vouchers and these were not to exceed a figure of 30,000 annually.

Although the Labour Party opposed restrictions as being “disastrous to [Britain’s] status in the Commonwealth,” it introduced even tougher measures of its own after winning the 1964 election. Work vouchers were reduced to 8,500 a year and were made available only to those Commonwealth citizens with industrial skills or professional qualifications.

An Act outlawing racial discrimination in public places was passed in 1965, but Kenya’s decision to expel Asians (including many Sikhs) who preferred to retain their British citizenship led to the erection of fresh barriers. Perturbed at the possible consequences of another large immigrant influx, the government allowed free entry only to those Commonwealth citizens whose grandparents had been born in Britain.

Despite the application of rigorous immigration controls, the contentious issue of coloured immigration continued to dominate British politics in the late 1960s.

In 1972, further fuel was added to the debate when the British government decided to admit Ugandan Asians expelled by the Ugandan leader General Idi Amin only if they held British passports. By the end of the year nearly 30,000 Ugandan Asians, including many Sikhs forced to leave the bulk of their assets and possessions in Uganda, were enduring their first British winter.

Today, more than 300,000 Sikhs live in the United Kingdom, and Sikh connections to the country date back to the beginning of the nineteenth century.

The Sikhs are a community that have always strived to contribute to whichever society they live in. Be it as policemen, teachers, businessmen and women, in the media, sports and entertainment industries or in the charity sector, the living principles that underpin the faith of a Sikh shine through – love for others, respect for the truth, personal courage, and the ever-positive spirit of determination.

To recognise good in every person or situation, and to maintain the highest of spiritual standards established by their forefathers for the greater good of society, this is the legacy that the Sikhs will always be compelled to protect and to live by.

"Empire, Faith and Kinship" can be accessed through www.efk.ukpha.org and the on-line exhibition is accompanied by a professional print ready download that community groups, student bodies, parents and educators can use to display the exhibition at their venues.


Amandeep Madra
About the author:


Comments (3) >> feed

Zorawar Singh said: _

  Unfortunately I cannot share such an enthusiastic view of this so called relationship..to be a Sikh also means to have developed a great deal of tollerance and understanding as well as forgiveness,but not lack of memory...we were countless times betrayed and used..stimulated by this spirit of a warrior nation,we were induced to sacrifice the lives of many of our kin...remember BHAGAT SINGH...not to mention so many others..the british empire up to date,uses the old roman concept..divide and conquer..we are not all "sepoys" we are also "Nihang" wich means we do not all follow material promises and better comforted life...we should try to keep something more then a turban or a post in the police comissioner's office...for this we have ten great souls showing the way...never to be a slave...even for convenience..
October 16, 2007

sathari singh said: _

  For most of India the British were an improvement over the Mughals, but in Punjab the government was native and well liked by all denominations. The Sikh Raj is the center of Punjabi nationalists’ history understanding in Pakistan where it is fondly remembered, as opposed to those who look to the Mughals and Islamic state concept. So the coming of the British to Punjab was a loss.
The British were better than the Mughals who were put on the throne by the 1857 Sepoy mutineers resulting in lack of support from most sections of the Indian population, including the Sikhs.
The Sikh relationship with the Brits was a matter of the lesser of two evils. The British were better than the Mughals, better than the Japanese. This is the motivation of the Sikh community.
Despite the common understanding of Indian history Gandhi did not win India its independence. The British desperate for help in WW2 wanted a peaceful and cooperative India. Gandhi called for no resistance worth the word to the advancing Japanese, despite their massacre of Diaspora Indian communities in South East Asia. The British told the soldiers that India would be free two years after the war was won. The war ended in the Pacific theater on August 15 of 1945; India was granted independence on August 15 1947 two years to the date. At least the British kept that promise.
The Sikhs and Muslims formed the better part of the WW2 Indian army. Muslims because of Jinnah’s urgings were 65% of that army and Sikhs a good part as well. Hindus were slow to join because Gandhi urged them not to but to resist the Japanese non violently which would have resulted in a massacre of Indians as it did in S.E. Asia and the prisoner war camps where about 75% of the Indian soldiers died. The Fascist Japanese had no respect for Indians or anybody else they could conquer.
But nevertheless both parties though the WW2 was a good thing and the Brits in gratitude to the Muslims gave them Pakistan and offered the Sikhs a state as well, which was declined.
The Raj is fondly remembered in UK where many families had ancestors who served in India. Sikhs are part of that fond memory. As an Irishman who became a Sikh I can relate that Great Grandpa who worked on the railroads loved India more than damp rainy old Ireland. His stories were like those of Rudyard Kipling. A great uncle went on to become an officer in the Indian army. When I became a Sikh he spoke highly of the religion and people smoothing the way with my family.
The relationship between the British and India is not based on an Imperial relationship but on a relationship of people. Many British went out to India and many married local women a fact indicated in DNA studies of the British population. The average British person in India loved the place and hated to go home. Many were born there and raised by their Indian nannies and were often Indian in religion and taste. They brought home a love for Indian food, curiosity about Indian religion and other things Indian. Indian spiritual thought is popular amongst many people in Britian and chicken masala is the country’s most popular dish.
The respect and love between many British and Indians was forged in the memories of average people who interfaced under Imperial conditions. They struck a mutual cord and the cultures are drawing nearer and nearer each day. This fondness was not based on the relationship of conquered and conqueror. Sathari Singh NYC
October 17, 2007

Zorawar Singh said: _

  As an irishman you should also remember what was done to your country...and India is not a food parlor to exchange chutneys and masalas in the name of friendship and culture..the individual's feelings towards one another is one thing and is free from prejudice..it is the enormous cruelty in wich India was sucked to the bones by the British empire that is not something easy to pretend as "less worst" or better then the Mughal's...Akbar is not seen in that way..but in case people forget about certain laws of the B.E. towards indians..cutting hands and thumbs if Ayurveda was practiced,or if silk and cotton was loomed at home..etc are just a few things that a letter from the queen saying "we are sorry for what we did to you" is quite clear...
October 18, 2007
Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
efkBanner