| Sikh Devotees Locked Out - Hooligans take over shrine in Lahore |
|
|
|
| Written by The Tribune India | ||||||||
| Thursday, 23 August 2007 | ||||||||
|
It said the government’s action was “almost like the way Islamabad hesitated over the Lal Masjid affair,” and asked if President Pervez Musharraf was “aware of the potential danger in this development.” In an editorial, the newspaper urged Lt Gen (rtd) Zulfiqar Ali Khan to “act without delay.” A failure on his part, it warned, could prompt the Muslim clerics opposed to the government to “escalate the incident into a national crisis.” “Is President Musharraf aware of the potential danger in this development?” the editorial asked. The shrine in the heart of Lahore is under the control of The Evacuee Trust Property Board (EPTB). The newspaper did not explain how General Khan, a former chief of the Water and power Development Authority (WAPDA) that deals with development of water supply, is connected with the shrine. The newspaper said that the ‘hooligans’ had locked the Sikh devotees out and had painted Islamic motifs. They claim that the shrine was originally the “tomb of one Pir Kaku Shah, a claim not supported by the local Muslim community.” The Sikh temple in Lahore’s Naulakha Bazaar is the remains of Bhai Taro Singh who was known to be a patron of the poor. He died in 1745, harassed by a local ruler. The Sikh community built a temple in his honour which is now in the custody of the EPTB as alien property. “Whatever the facts, General Khan should take no more time in deciding the matter unless he thinks the Sikh shrine is no longer evacuee property after 60 years,” the newspaper observed. The plea for avoiding “Lal Masjid-like situation” was a reference to the military-led operation last month at the controversial mosque where 167 people died and many injured in the process of evacuating Muslim devotees and students, both boys and girls. The military action, taken after nearly six months’ siege, earned praise for Musharraf among the world community and the liberals at home, but has angered the conservatives and the clergy, leading to several suicide attacks. — IANS | ||||||||
Amandeep Madra
said:
|
||||||||
| This stroy seems to refute the earlier allegations http://www.hindu.com/2007/08/25/stories/2007082562031600.htm |

| Its outrageous to think that the muslims have locked the sikhs out claiming that the shrine was originally the “tomb of one Pir Kaku Shah but a claim not supported by the local Muslim community.? and yet the government is hesitating to do anything about it. |

| this temple is rightly a sikh temple,the goverment should through these muslims out on their rears.islam is a religion of tolerance not a bully religion.the sikhs have the right to the temple so give it back to them.if it was back in the 1800s the muslims would not be doing this becouse the sikhs would have fought and defended their rights and would have won too.sikhs are a good people and are not trouble makers like alot of muslims seem to be now |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|