Lost Password? No account yet? Register
  • Narrow screen resolution
  • Wide screen resolution
  • Auto width resolution
  • Increase font size
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size
Dalip Singh: A life in struggle PDF Print E-mail
Written by Kanwarjit Singh Kang   
Saturday, 14 July 2007

Dalip SinghDespite being cut off from his heritage and cultural roots early in life, Maharaja Dalip Singh continued his struggle against the British. Kanwarjit Singh Kang on lesser-known aspects of Dalip Singh’s life

Not many may be aware of the peculiar circumstances that conditioned the struggle of Maharaja Dalip Singh, the son and successor to Maharaja Ranjit Singh, against the British.

Born in 1838, Dalip’s father died when he was less than a year old. His childhood witnessed the strenuous battle for succession. Dalip was installed the Maharaja of Punjab in 1843 when he was only five. He was put under the charge of a tutor guardian, Dr John Login. Dalip remained in Lahore till he was 12, after which he was sent to Fatehgarh, a village in U.P. From there, he was taken to England in 1854.

A study of historical records has revealed that the events were manoeuvered by Lord Dalhousie, the then Governor-General of India. The Maharaja’s entourage was dismissed and his connection with his roots severed. At 12, Dalip was projected as having become deeply religious and in his quest for truth was stated to be engaged in a comparative study of the Guru Granth Sahib and the Bible and finally discovered that the salvation of his soul lay in the Bible.

Lord Dalhousie wrote to Sir George Couper about Dalip’s decision to embrace Christianity: "Politically we could desire nothing better; it destroys his possible influence for ever".

Dalhousie further opposed Dalip’s marriage to his Sikh fiancee, the daughter of Chattar Singh. He wrote to Dr Login: "I do not wish to countenance any relations henceforth between the Maharaja and the Sikhs, either by alliance with a Sikh family, or sympathy with Sikh feelings." Dalip finally decided not to marry Chattar Singh’s daughter.
Dalip was installed the Maharaja of Punjab in 1843 when he was only five.


Dalhousie also poisoned Dalip’s mind against his mother, Rani Jindan, who had escaped from her prison in the fort of Chunar and was living in Nepal under political asylum. Dalip reached London in May 1854, but when he heard that Jung Bahadoor of Nepal wanted to get rid of Rani Jindan, Dalip decided to sail for India. He was allowed but with the condition that he would not visit Punjab.

Dalip Singh 2When Dalip reached Calcutta, several Sikh regiments that had returned from the China war besieged his hotel to see their Maharaja. Lord Canning urged the Maharaja to return to England at once. The Maharaja did just that but took his mother with him.

Jindan told her son that he had a claim to his private ancestral estate in Punjab. This prompted the Maharaja to study the Blue Book at the British Museum and present his claim to his family estates, including ancestral properties and family jewellery.

Rani Jindan died in August 1863. After immersing her last remains in the Godawari, Dalip, on his way back to London, married Bamba Muller, daughter of a German businessman and an Abyssinian mother, at Alexandria. The couple settled at their new house in Elveden Estate in England.

Dalip continued to pursue his claims. He debated the issue publicly and wrote a lengthy letter to the Times, which was published. This was followed by an editorial to which Dalip replied. Dalip then decided to proceed to Punjab to obtain the details of his private property, but was not allowed.

The news about his intending visit to India and the restrictions imposed on him, reverberated in Punjab too. The Tribune, then published from Lahore, in its issue of August, 1883, wrote editorially: "It is true that the Maharaja has been in England since a long time and has adopted English manners, customs and modes of life, but yet he could not have forgotten that he was born in this country and that he is the son of one of the most powerful of Indian Princes. Brilliant associations crowd round his infancy which all his education and foreign training may not have been able altogether to efface, and it is, therefore, natural that he should feel a longing to see the land with which those associations are so intimately connected.

Amidst all the gaieties of Eleveden Hall and the pleasures of and English-married life, it was impossible for him to forget that he was by birth a native of India. And that we think is reason enough to impel him to visit the country of his forefathers."

Disillusioned, Dalip realised that he was in exile. He made up his mind to leave England forever. He left for India with his family in April 1886, but was not allowed to proceed beyond Aden. Thakur Singh Sandhanwalia, his cousin, met him there and persuaded him to return to his own faith which he agreed to, and the ceremony of Pahul was gone through in the presence of Thakur Singh and four other Sikhs.

Thereafter Dalip resigned the stipend paid to him by the British under the Treaty of Annexation. From Aden, he went to Paris and contacted the Russian Embassy. He met Patrick Casey, an Irish revolutionary who introduced him to M. Katkoff, a renowned Russian journalist, who helped him visit Russia. He tried to convince the Russians about his ability to stir political unrest for the British in India.

Unfortunately, Katkoff died. By now, Dalip was short of money. He sent his trusted lieutenant Arur Singh to India to raise money who collected Rs. 80,000 but was arrested. Meanwhile, Thakur Singh Sandhanwalia and Dalip’s wife died. Even though Dalip had failed in his mission in Russia, he continued his campaign against the Raj and issued an appeal to his fellow Indians on June 25, 1889, for the cause
of freedom.

Dalip died on October 22, 1893. Although Dalip’s love for his country was revived quite late in life, he never forgave those who had cut him off from his heritage and cultural roots.



Comments (11) >> feed

Prabhu Singh Khalsa said: _

  "in his quest for truth was stated to be engaged in a comparative study of the Guru Granth Sahib and the Bible and finally discovered that the salvation of his soul lay in the Bible."
Anybody who has studied both the Bible and the Siri Guru Granth Sahib, would know this to be a lie. I find it humorous, having been dissappointed time and again with the writings of the Bible, it seems so outrageous. I'm not attacking the whole Bible or saying that other "religious" texts are immune. I know that both the Bible and the Koran say who you're allowed to go to war with and who you can keep as slaves. Mixed in with inspiration, these books contain very primitave human behaviors. Even studying the mool mantra, the first stanza of the first page of the Siri Guru Granth Sahib, one will discover more profound and enlightening truths than what can be compartively studied any where else.
July 16, 2007 | url

Mandeep Kaur said: _

  I don't know much history but I do know some of the facts which were totally omitted from this story. Dalip Singh son of Maharaja Ranjit Singh was deliberately taken to England by the British, and they cut Dalip Singhs hair and coverted him to Christianity. When Dalip Singh met with his Mother Maharani Jinda, she reminded Dalip Singh who son he was and was unhappy and hurt to see he lost his sikh identity. Dalip Singh then kept his hair and realized what had happened and how he was deliberately disconnected from his roots by the British. I wish some of these real important facts were mentioned in this article. It is a little misleading that Dalip Singh had a choice over the Bible or Guru Granth Sahib, I believe that there was no choice given in any situation; this was all planned how to destroy the Sikh Empire.
July 18, 2007

Manpreet Sodhi said: _

  People come up with all kinds of fanciful explanations about comparitive study of religion and it is people who have not studied / realised what Guru Granth Sahib Ji says, are then misled by anyone who has the gift of the gab.

Essentially, what Guru Jee say's is so deep that ordinary mortals may just find it difficult to comprehend. At other times what Guru Jee say's is so simply worded that you don't get the full impact of it all.

However one thing is very sure, Guru Jee has shown a way of life which is for the awakened person.

(On a lighter side, I say that Sikhism is for the most intelligent of the lot. Others, please continue to follow your paths of salvation.)
July 19, 2007

gurpreet said: _

  test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test
July 19, 2007 | url

sukhbinder singh said: _

  I totally agree with Manpreet Sodhi.
July 19, 2007 | url

surinder pal singh said: _

  no one can be held responsible for what happened to dalip singh since he was a small kid and britishers were to destroy sikh raj.it is only maharaja ranjit singh who is responsible ,who had not allowed or selected his heir who could take care of sikh raj.who so ever tried to become heir of his raj was finished by him.
July 19, 2007 | url

harinder tagore said: _

  Surindersingh's comments are ambigous , it's not correct to say that no one else is responsible for sikh raj's destruction other than m.haraja ranjit singh him self.No doubt dalip was a child but he was taken to England forcibly by Britishers and was never allowed to come back and see his parents and country,Please refer to the book Maharani Jinda in punjabi for more and correct infomation .I studied about him in my study time long ago but the information provided by the writer is neither accurate nor enough .please refer punjabi books because some times translations kill the essence of the real text.I'm in u.s. now adays otherwise could provide full information for your ready ref.
July 23, 2007

sandeep singh said: _

  just wondering any one in Sadhawalia family cousins of maharaja still around?
July 31, 2007

Sonya kaur said: _

  you know what i tottally agree with manpreet sodhi 2!!
August 06, 2007

kiran said: _

  Its all mixed comments,In my view Maharaja was responsible for the annexation of punjab becausehe didn't make a capable heir to the throne and British were waiting for him to die. They knew very well that after maharaja there was nobody to look after Punjab. If you think British were ruling 3rd of the world and rest of india they ll do anything to add punjab in that. In all honesty if it was maharaja Ranjit Singh in Britisher's shoes he would have done the same. I am sure we all know how he made one punjab out of 12 Misals. So what british did was expected but Maharaja could have done better for punjab.
August 16, 2007

Harbans Singh Noor said: _

  You may read
"Did Maharaja Duleep Singh Embrace Christianity of His Own Free Will?"
in "Connecting the Dots in Sikh History"
published by Institute of Sikh Studies, Chandigarh.
December 02, 2007
Write comment

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
efkBanner